Whilst the growth in demand will add many more implant recipients to the care of audiologists, the profession itself is expected to grow far slower (Freeman, 2009), and significant changes in cochlear implant fitting and management have been anticipated (Shapiro & Bradham, 2012). As such, the new technology has the potential to expand the capacity of audiological care without compromising efficacy.ĭespite the success of the multichannel cochlear implant in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss, less than 10% of potential candidates have received an implant (see, for example, NIDCD, 2004). Conclusions: Equivalent speech perception outcomes were demonstrated when compared to current best practice. No statistically significant differences were found in the subjective program preferences of the subjects. The lower bounds of the 95% confidence intervals of the differences represented clinically insignificant differences. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the group mean scores, whether fitted by the recipient or by an experienced audiologist.
Study sample:Thirty-seven subjects participated in the trials. Design: Two trials were conducted, comparing the fitting methodology with the existing Custom Sound™ methodology, as fitted by the recipient and by an experienced cochlear implant audiologist.
Additional tools for home care and surgical care are also described.
Change language remote assistant cr110 Pc#
It is implemented on multiple platforms, including a mobile platform ( Remote Assistant Fitting) and an accessible PC application ( Nucleus Fitting Software). A new fitting methodology is presented that, at its simplest level, requires a single volume adjustment, and at its advanced level, provides access to 22-channel fitting. Objective: This article provides a detailed description and evaluation of the next Nucleus ® cochlear implant fitting suite.
0 kommentar(er)
